Search

Denmark: Primus Motor (‘Driving Force’)

Third place

ECPA 2024

The prevention of reoffending

Third place

Primus Motor (‘Driving Force’) is an innovative and well-structured prison-based mentoring program aiming to reduce recidivism. While mentoring schemes usually offer only a one-on-one-relationship, each participating inmate is carefully matched with two volunteer mentors from the inmate’s release area. In order to ensure a qualified effort, mentors have been trained and are offered supervision. They persistently support and motivate mentees’ skill-building and law-abiding behavior during frequent prison visits and throughout the well-documented particularly vulnerable transition period of release.

Primus Motor is especially targeted at repeat offenders and inmates, who are usually the most unreachable for resocialization measures. The intervention has a holistic approach to the reintegration of inmates into society by considering both e.g. health-related, educational, work-related, housing and social needs in cooperation with the Danish Prison and Probation Service and municipal actors.

The Jury awards the Danish project ‘Primus Motor’ (‘Driving Force’) third place. They commended the provision of peer support through the use of volunteers, especially in combination with the target group.  Especially, since the volunteering culture is not yet a common practice throughout Europe. Additionally, the Jury applauded the involvement of various partners to ensure good assistance as well as obtain relevant outcomes.

Download documents

(the document list below will be filtered upon selecting an option)

QUALIPREV score

Effective
Effective
  1. Problem analysis and ojectives 4
  2. Prevention framework 4
  3. Outcome evaluation 3
  4. Information on context and implementation 4
  1. robustly designed prevention programme for the prevention of recidivism
  2. pilot was the subject of a randomised controlled trial, providing strong evidence for its positive outcomes in terms of recidivism reduction and cost-effectiveness
  1. process evaluation would benefit from more systematic reporting on more process indicators
  2. evidence in support of the programme could be strengthened by monitoring long-term impacts
  3. evaluation reports should be published in English to promote cross-border sharing